Talk:Fort Steuben Bridge/GA1
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Denimadept in topic GA Review
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: CycloneIsaac (talk · contribs) 17:42, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Going to review this over this week.—– 17:42, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
- You probably should tell the cost of the toll.
- Good point, found cost in 1940.♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:59, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
- "Improvements to the bridge were made in 1956." What type of improvements?
- Snippet I picked up doesn't say, all I could find was that improvements were made then!♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:51, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
- Ref 10 is cited improperly. See {{Cite press release}}.
- It's not essential though is it, even citation templates aren't compulsory. Perhaps User:ChrisGualtieri could address that?♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:00, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
- Ref 5 is missing a few details. The Ohio Good Roads Federation wrote the book.
- Publisher added, couldn't find any more details in google books.♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:53, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
- "appropriation bill for the Department of Transportation mentioned" Optional, you should change Department of Transportation -> United States Department of Transportation, so it would not be confused for ODOT.
Article's going on hold. Happy two-year anniversary of the demolition!—– 03:01, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
United States Department of Transportation was linked anyway but I piped it. Should be OK now @CycloneIsaac:. All addressed I believe.♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:15, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
Other than that one citation (I'll fix it), the article looks fine, passing!—– 23:06, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks, Dr. Blofeld and CycloneIsaac! Been really busy as of late with life, thanks for polishing it up some more. This article was something that I am not too major of a contributor, but I was asked to help work on it and I'm glad its a GA. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 01:49, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- You're welcome. If you can get this to GA, we might have a Good topic.—– 02:24, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- Okay, let's start working on it. - Denimadept (talk) 17:06, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- You're welcome. If you can get this to GA, we might have a Good topic.—– 02:24, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks, Dr. Blofeld and CycloneIsaac! Been really busy as of late with life, thanks for polishing it up some more. This article was something that I am not too major of a contributor, but I was asked to help work on it and I'm glad its a GA. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 01:49, 22 February 2014 (UTC)