Talk:Fortress (cancelled video game)
(Redirected from Talk:Fortress (Square Enix))
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Judgesurreal777 in topic New info
 | Fortress (cancelled video game) has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||
 | Fortress (cancelled video game) is part of the Final Fantasy XII series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
| Current status: Good article | ||||||||||||||||
GamesIndustry.biz, Computer and Video Games, and Official Xbox Magazine are reliable sources. Jonathan Hardin' (talk) 07:33, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
- What's mentioned above is mostly just rumours and speculation. Surely the game was in the works as mentioned in the interview, but, at the same time, the latter clearly states that Square Enix did not want this game to show up. In addition, Eidos Montreal official website doesn't list this game as being in development. Postwar (talk) 11:45, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
- Of course it doesn't list it, it's an unnannounced and unconfirmed game. The nature of what's mentioned above is duely noted in this article (in other words, there are only sentences like "an alleged tech demo (...) The video description stated (...) a possible new home (...)", etc., and no sentences like "It's a fact that Eidos is...", etc.). So please stop removing these reliable sources from the article. First you claimed these sources were not reliable, then you claimed that these sources didn't exist (sic)... This is making little sense. Jonathan Hardin' (talk) 11:55, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
- Agreed. Then I'll just rearrange the article a little bit and restore the links you've deleted. Postwar (talk) 12:26, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
- Of course it doesn't list it, it's an unnannounced and unconfirmed game. The nature of what's mentioned above is duely noted in this article (in other words, there are only sentences like "an alleged tech demo (...) The video description stated (...) a possible new home (...)", etc., and no sentences like "It's a fact that Eidos is...", etc.). So please stop removing these reliable sources from the article. First you claimed these sources were not reliable, then you claimed that these sources didn't exist (sic)... This is making little sense. Jonathan Hardin' (talk) 11:55, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
Developer name
editI started a requested move for GRIN (company) which may impact the name of this article. --Mika1h (talk) 17:35, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
- The proposal is here: Talk:GRIN_(company)#Requested move.--Mika1h (talk) 17:36, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
New info
editNeoGAF thread, corroborated by Polygon. There are a few interesting revelations here (ex, "we did not even know what game/brand it was until the very last two months") and if you do incorporate them, please cite the original source as a primary source and NOT the NeoGAF thread. That said, many thanks to DiipuSurotu for compiling this information in one place. Axem Titanium (talk) 15:11, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
- Used it! Judgesurreal777 (talk) 02:34, 25 May 2020 (UTC)