Talk:Forum on China–Africa Cooperation
 | A news item involving Forum on China–Africa Cooperation was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 10 November 2009. |  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
edit
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 August 2019 and 18 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Wyatt-Waters.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 21:43, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Google bombed
editNote that this article is being linked to by Google news on the morning of November 9, 2009. The story about China sending US$10 Billion to Africa was (at least briefly) showing up at the top of their new pages.
— V = I * R (talk to Ω) 09:52, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
lead section : importance of the forum
editHello, the introduction don't expose the importance of the forum. I tried twice to include :
- Africa met here its 2nd trade partner, China. Strategically, it's a representation of the recent decades increase relation between African raw materials, Chinese industries, and world customers. This forum occurs only once every 3 years, and represent 2 billion people.
but user:Ghmyrtle delete the whole because of grammar mistake. Please, someone to correct my two grammar mistake, rather that simply delete the whole. An introduction which state that a forum did occur and how many times is not an introduction, it's a planning. Yug (talk) 19:12, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
- There were two problems with your version. Firstly, it was difficult to understand, as clearly English is not your first language. Secondly, the parts which were understandable were not appropriate for the introduction, in my view. The current wording is much better. Ghmyrtle (talk) 23:27, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
Traditional Chinese
editWhy is the title translated to Traditional Chinese in addition to Simplified? The People's Republic of China only uses Simplified Chinese. Ssahsahnatye (talk) 21:38, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
- I don't see the problem. 140.120.55.73 (talk) 07:01, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
Source
editFeel free to read it and expand the article.
- Deborah Brautigam, What the West Can Learn From Chinese Investment in Africa, Foreign Affairs
{{citation}}: External link in|publisher=and|title=