Talk:Foundation for Biomedical Research
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Foundation for Biomedical Research article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Recent edits
editThere have been a bunch of recent edits, so I think it's a good idea for me to put a few words here, explaining what I did. Another editor (Bob) first made some extensive edits, most of which I like and agree with, particularly for removing some COI-sounding fluff that had been there before. The most substantive changes I have made following that, was to address some POV and balance concerns that I think came from duplicating material from the animal testing page. I've tried to retain the references cited from critics, but to make the page sound less like a prosecutorial attack on the organization. My changes have shortened the page, but I think better material can be added going forward. (I have to add that I think the edits I made are mild compared with what would have happened with comparable issues at the PETA page.) But please ask if there are any questions about the changes I made, and I'll be happy to explain further. --Tryptofish (talk) 19:02, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
- No problem, good job, Trypto. I got a bit carried away with the animal testing stuff so it did wander from the topic. Way shorter now but more concise and if someone wants to follows the refs, they can. Bob98133 (talk) 22:20, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks! --Tryptofish (talk) 22:32, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
"ResearchSaves.org" ad campaign
editI see this ad on GSN (not known for taking ethical ads, but ANY ad) at 3 in the morning and went to the website to, whose corporate sponsor is the FBR. A copy of it (the Jenn one) is also on YouTube.
Macshill (talk) 07:30, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
- An ad campaign by an advocacy org is not particularly notable since that is what such groups do. Bob98133 (talk) 16:00, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Foundation for Biomedical Research. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110723001342/http://www.pcrm.org/resch/anexp/index.html to http://www.pcrm.org/resch/anexp/index.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080308163109/http://www.nabr.org/pdf/orange.pdf to http://www.nabr.org/pdf/orange.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:56, 3 January 2017 (UTC)