Talk:Founding of Wallachia/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 14:28, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 14:32, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   The article is reasonably well written and complies sufficiently with the manual of style.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Reference #66[1] appears to be an unreliable source.

 Done (the unreliable source is deleted) Borsoka (talk) 19:07, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

1. I assume good faith for all off-line sources.

1. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   It appears both broad and focussed.

2. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

3. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

4. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   File:Terratransalpina.png has no description or author information.

 Done (the map is deleted; otherwise, it is an excellent map which does not contradict to the sources referred to in the article, but I am not in the position to fix it) Borsoka (talk) 19:07, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

2. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Just a few points to be addressed. On Hold for seven days. Jezhotwells (talk) 14:53, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

   OK, thanks for fixing those point. as you say, it is a pity about the map, but images do need sourcing information. I am haoppy to pass this as a Good Article.