Talk:Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution/GA3
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Adam Cuerden (talk · contribs) 22:28, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
This is a very good start, but there are a few issues. The main issue is a number of "unfinished stories", where very briefly detailing the way they were resolved would allow the reader to move on.
- Section: "Native Americans". It would be worth mentioning this issue was finally and permanently resolved with the Indian Citizenship Act of 1924.
Done -- Khazar2 (talk) 11:49, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
- "Children born to citizens of other countries" - I believe that a child born in the United States is generally considered a United States citizen under current practice. Mentioning this would clarify.
- Done -- Khazar2 (talk) 11:55, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
- "Power of enforcement" - this section is just unclear, and very difficult to understand. It could use a major copyedit.
- I've made some tweaks that may help. Let me know what you think. -- Khazar2 (talk) 11:57, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
A good start, as I say. Fix those few things, and we're probably ready for GA. Adam Cuerden (talk) 22:28, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks, Adam, both for the suggestions and for taking this on in the first place. I'm on semiwikibreak this week and avoiding in-depth editing, but I should be able to get to this sometime this weekend. -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:12, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
- If you're doing Thirteenth as well, I'll probably get to that one sometime this week too, by the way. Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:37, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
- Oh, that'd be terrific. User:Groupuscule is the lead editor there but I've had a hand in it as well. -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:45, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
- If you're doing Thirteenth as well, I'll probably get to that one sometime this week too, by the way. Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:37, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
I've made a couple of small tweaks, and think it's now ready for GA. ✓ Pass. I do hope you intend to take this to FA; I'd suggest a peer review first for a few more eyes (I am, after all, not a lawyer), but I think this is a magnificent article, at the least very nearly ready for FA. Adam Cuerden (talk) 16:26, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks so much! This one's really been a team effort. -- Khazar2 (talk) 11:39, 19 July 2013 (UTC)