Talk:Framingham station/GA1

(Redirected from Talk:Framingham Railroad Station/GA1)
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Will211 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Will211 (talk · contribs) 02:24, 19 January 2016 (UTC)Reply


It is well written

edit

the prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct  

and it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.  


By the 1970s, the station had fallen into disrepair; part of the roof actually collapsed in 1978. Remove the word actually-Done

The station closed with the end of passenger service in the 1930s, and then spent some time as a branch of the Framingham Public library, and a private garage. Change sentence to spent time as a branch of the Framingham Public Library, and then spent time as a private garage.-Done

Article is now well written

Verifiable with no original research

edit

it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline  

all in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines  

it contains no original research  

it contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism  

Broad in its coverage

edit

it addresses the main aspects of the topic  

it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail  

Neutral

edit

it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each  

Stable

edit

it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute  

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate

edit

images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content  

images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions  

Overall

edit

I have reviewed this article, and it has passed the Good Article Guidelines.