Talk:Francisco Santos (footballer)

This article was nominated for deletion on 2015-10-24. The result of the discussion was Withdrawn.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Portugal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Portugal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Portugal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PortugalWikipedia:WikiProject PortugalTemplate:WikiProject PortugalPortugal articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Portugal To-do:

Find correct name The airport is not listed as João Paulo II anywhere. The airport's own website calls itself simply Ponta Delgada, and has no mention of João Paulo.

Improve key articles to Good article

Improve

Review

Category:History of Portugal: lots to remove there
Template:Regions of Portugal: statistical (NUTS3) subregions and intercommunal entities are confused; they are not the same in all regions, and should be sublisted separately in each region: intermunicipal entities are sometimes larger and split by subregions (e.g. the Metropolitan Area of Lisbon has two subregions), some intercommunal entities are containing only parts of subregions. All subregions should be listed explicitly and not assume they are only intermunicipal entities (which accessorily are not statistic subdivisions but real administrative entities, so they should be listed below, probably using a smaller font: we can safely eliminate the subgrouping by type of intermunicipal entity from this box).

Requests

See Requested articles

Assess

Help assessing articles.

Need images

Translate from Portuguese Wikipedia

Wikify

Vote:

Watch this list — Edit this list

Split history?

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

@Wgolf and Spinningspark: To continue the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Francisco Santos (footballer):

Regarding the edits from here (sorry about the diff instead of old-revision link - there appears to be a bug when viewing the first vandalized revision) through the last version before I reverted back to the pre-vandalized version, should they be:

kept
revision-deleted under WP:A7 (does it qualify as A7?)
sent to WP:AFD with a recommendation that only those edits be revision-deleted.
other outcome?

I'm leaning towards A7-revision-deletion if it qualifies. If it goes to AFD I will say "yes" but I'm not sure if it's a "big enough deal" to send to AFD. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 02:07, 25 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

You should really be saying this at the AfD. I'm not seeing that it does qualify under A7, but an AFD decision to do so would qualify under WP:REVDEL criterion #5. I would also question whether deletion is really necessary, reverting gets the job done. All in all, this would be much easier to discuss and deal with if the article histories were first split. SpinningSpark 08:19, 25 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Add topic