Talk:Free frank

Philately Low‑importance

	Philately portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philately, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of philately and stamp collecting on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhilatelyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilatelyTemplate:WikiProject PhilatelyPhilately articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics of the United Kingdom Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Inappropriate external link

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

(I have moved Gwillhickers post from my talk page to here)

You first removed the link from the section and said it had "nothing to do with Free franks", which I found sort of amazing as the link had numerous examples and brief commentary on the items. After restoring the link and pointing out that it had much to do with Free franks, you reassert the claim, no explanation, and remark that I should take some advice sometime. The remark was uncalled for and certainly inappropriate as I often take advice. If there is a real issue here, kindly bring it to my attention. Now here's some advice. If you want to affect an outcome, you might want to try a little diplomacy first. Gwillhickers (talk) 23:18, 11 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

If you find my removing this "amazing" that may be because you do not understand Wikipedia rules on extenal links. An external link is supposed to provide “meaningful, relevant content that is not suitable for inclusion in an article for reasons unrelated to its accuracy” External links specifically should not be:

“13. Sites that are only indirectly related to the article's subject: the link should be directly related to the subject of the article. A general site that has information about a variety of subjects should usually not be linked to from an article on a more specific subject.”

This article deals with “free franks”, or letters sent through the mail franked by an authorized signature. The link you keep adding,this commercial website, is a huge list of hundreds of links to various postally used covers, the vast majority of which have stamps and thus have nothing to do with this subject. It is expressly and plainly an improper link for this article. Ecphora (talk) 22:02, 13 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Add topic