Talk:French ironclad Héroïne/GA1
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Sturmvogel 66 in topic GA Review
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 14:25, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
- Indicate in the infobox that the draft figure is at deep load
- "The ship displaced between 5,969 metric tons (5,875 long tons)" - The use of between is odd here. It implies there's a second figure in the range, which should be added. If there's not a second figure, remove "between"
- Just out of curiosity, is the upper figure in the the complement range for when it was a flagship? Is so, it should probably be indicated.
- You're probably right, but not specified in the sources.
- Prose gives conning tower armor as 100 mm, infobox gives 102 mm
- Waterline is a duplink
- I'm not seeing where the Stenzel and Konstam references listed in the bibliography are used
- Deleted Konstam, Stenzel is referenced in #10. Every once in a while I combine refs when it's too much trouble to sort out which fact goes with which source.
- In the Roche ref, (1671-1870) looks like it's part of a volume name. If so, it should be with the volume name, not stuck after the OCLC.
- Any chance of an OCLC for Stenzel and Wilson?
- Worldcat suggests that Roche is in French, if that's correct, then indicate in the citation
That's it, I believe. Just a little tidying up to do here. Hog Farm Bacon 16:16, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
- Looks like I forgot to update the bibliography on this article, n'est-ce pas? Thanks for reviewing this so quickly.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:03, 31 August 2020 (UTC)