Talk:GAU-13

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force

Muzzle v plus other issue

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Is there a reliable source to back the claim of 3600 ft/s? AFAIK, the muzzle v used to be around 3100 with the GAU-8 and the very same ammo. That would mean a ~30% increase in kinetic energy, with the same propellant. Is that at all possible? 217.251.166.67 (talk) 14:17, 13 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

And how does GAU-12 compare to GAU-13?

List inside list: Soviet/Russia inside Modern Gatling guns

I see the 7.62 WP round twice in a row:

Left column - Right column - Tooltip

7.62x54mm - GshG-7.62 - GShG-7.62 machine gun

7.62x54mm - Slostin - Slostin machine gun That is, the tooltips look consistent with the entries, but AFAIK, these two entries should be in the same row. Or shouldnt they? 217.251.166.67 (talk) 14:17, 13 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Motivation

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

"Unlike the GAU-8, however, it is pneumatically driven" Hey, I thought the GAU-8 was pneumatically driven. This needs clarifying. --217.209.145.79 (talk) 00:04, 10 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic