Talk:Geospatial intelligence

(Redirected from Talk:GEOINT)
Latest comment: 4 years ago by JLavigne508 in topic Merge proposal

GEOINT data sources

edit

This statement, "comprising the exploitation and analysis of satellite information", does not make sense. How can you state GEOINT IS from satellite information and the next sentence say the source can be collected from aircraft or by other means? The word satellite should be removed as it directly contradicts the second sentence, nor does it reflect the vision of the founding father of GEOINT (LTG (ret.) James R. Clapper, who frequently preached that GEOINT is from any source (and he meant any source, whether a human, aircraft, or satellite collected it... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.100.33.3 (talkcontribs) 22:58, 1 November 2006

If you think it should read differently, then be bold and change it! Especially if you know something about the topic. LobStoR (talk) 02:28, 7 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

The second sentence in the definition of GEOINT reads, "GEOINT sources include imagery and mapping data, whether collected by commercial satellite, government satellite or by other means, such as UAV (Unmanned Aerial Vehicle) or reconissance aircraft." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.100.33.3 (talkcontribs) 22:58, 1 November 2006

I have the same response as above... be bold.  LobStoR (talk) 02:28, 7 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

US Army definition

edit

US ARMY Defines GEOINT as: Intelligence derived from the exploitation, analysis, and fusion of imagery with geospatial information to describe, assess, and visually depict physical features and geographically referenced activities in the battlespace. GEOINT consists of imagery, imagery intelligence (IMINT) and geospatial information. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.27.1.2 (talkcontribs) 12:51, 11 January 2007

Unreferenced

edit

No footnotes or citations, just a list of external links. Tagged added. momoricks 00:20, 20 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Geospatial intelligence. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:51, 14 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Geospatial intelligence. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:34, 25 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Merge proposal

edit

Article seems too large and stands up on It's own to merge with GIS in geospatial intelligence article in my opinion, and I would suggest removing merger tag from up top, with a link being sufficient. --JLavigne508 (talk) 18:47, 18 July 2020 (UTC)Reply