Talk:Gabbar Singh (character)

File:Amjad Khan.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

The following images, used in this article, have been nominated for deletion: File:Amjad Khan.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 19 September 2011 File:Gabbar.jpg has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 10:42, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Requested move 12 May 2017

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (non-admin closure) GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 00:06, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

---

Gabbar Singh (character) → Gabbar Singh – This appears to be the primary topic as the other Gabbar Singhs are not as well known as this (some, such as the Telugu film being named after the character) and this gets more viewership than all of them except the film. Kailash29792 (talk) 06:51, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Oppose. As the film gets more views than the character (around four times as many [1]) there is no evidence that the character is the primary topic. Tassedethe (talk) 14:42, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

In the Telugu film, the character nicknames himself after the dacoit from Sholay. The film is hardly as significant as the character. --Kailash29792 (talk) 14:55, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Just because something is named after something else doesn't automatically make the first thing the primary topic. See e.g. Boston. Tassedethe (talk) 15:53, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Yes. Important. Andrewa (talk) 11:30, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Oppose. It seems that the film may be the primary topic, if there is one. But the character is not, on the evidence. That's unless the claim that the film is hardly as significant as the character can be substantiated... it seems unlikely, the character does appear in other films but these are all derivatives of, and far less famous than, the original. Andrewa (talk) 11:30, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Occupation Dacoit

oh... did i actually read "Occupation Dacoit" and title "sardar"???? hehehehe wikipedia is so funny sometimes in all its seriousness... hahahahaha... long live wikipedia -- Adamstraw99 (talk) 18:43, 27 February 2018 (UTC)