![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Gao Gang
editI tidied this page, removing spelling errors and adding sections. I also added several different interpretations of what happened behind the scenes, something that remains uncertain. And made it clear that Gao Gang remained officially condemned. Finally I removed the 'stub' marker, which has been there since it was just a single paragraph. It can't still be viewed as a stub, though undoubtedly more could be added, including a non-copyright photo. --GwydionM 15:04, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
I've added a section on the purge. DOR (HK) (talk) 01:49, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
May I ask what is the purpose of the red coloured links? They do not lead anywhere, and appear quite conspicuous. Given that this is such a specialised subject, is it realistic that the red links are an invitation for others like us to create those pages? My other question is: can I remove them? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Homunculus99 (talk • contribs) 01:38, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
I have made major changes to this page. I have organised in into clearer sections. Statements have been backed up with proper citations. Red links have been removed. Links to other pages (especially regarding the names of CCP figures) have been included. - Tangzhenlin.Tangzhenlin (talk) 14:02, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
Sources
editMuch as I admire Professor Frederick C. Teiwes' fine work, my view is that 21 out of 31 citations to a single source is stretching it. DOR (HK) (talk) 09:29, 5 December 2010 (UTC)