Talk:General Dynamics F-111C/GA1
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Sp33dyphil in topic GA Review
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Ian Rose (talk) 06:56, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
Technical review
- No dab links -- no action req'd.
- Couple of external links appear dead -- pls check and update or drop.
- Removed. Sp33dyphil "Ad astra" 06:35, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
Prose
- Performed fairly extensive copyedit and am generally happy with the way it reads now -- no action req'd IMO.
- In Design, however, it's pretty well all present tense -- I'm not certain of the standard in articles where aircraft is no longer operational but there are still some flying examples, however my feeling is that it should probably be altered to past tense throughout.
- Done Nick-D (talk) 00:50, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks Nick for the change, and for your prior effort before I came. Sp33dyphil "Ad astra" 01:55, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
- Done Nick-D (talk) 00:50, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
Content
- Seems to cover major points; being familiar with this story I felt the details of its selection and purchase could stand some modification, which I did using a source already used in the article -- no further action req'd IMO.
Referencing
- All statements appear to be cited and refs appear reliable -- no action req'd.
Structure
- There's some repetition that I think can be put down to the structure employed but, on the other hand, that structure seems to be par for the course in aircraft articles so I can handle it -- no action req'd.
Supporting materials
- All images appear appropriately licensed -- no action req'd.
- Not sure why we need an F-111G image in the F-111C article, especially since it doesn't seem to highlight any differences in design. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 15:37, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
- Removed. Sp33dyphil "Ad astra" 06:35, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks Sp for your responses, and Nick for taking care of the last outstanding item -- I know you helped enhance the article prior to this nom as well. Ready to pass as GA now, well done all. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 01:25, 2 July 2011 (UTC)