Talk:Genevieve Vaughan

Latest comment: 2 years ago by 2601:40A:8202:4B50:3461:FB44:3445:D81B in topic Propose deletion

edit

Gee whiz, Genevieve, you wrote yourself an entire wikipedia page, complete with citations that you authored. I'm sure you do good work, but this is--at the end of the day--just a self-authored promotional piece. --Smilo Don (talk) 18:14, 13 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Genevieve Vaughan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:45, 9 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Propose deletion

edit

This article is largely written like a brochure or autobiography and all external links and sources are to publications and websites owned by the subject. A review of the subject’s writings on Amazon finds less than 5 user reviews per title and no significant sales information that would support this being a notable author warranting an article of this size and breathlessness. Without any third party sources to indicate this person is of any note outside of their own imagination I do not feel this article deserves to exist. 2601:40A:8202:4B50:3461:FB44:3445:D81B (talk) 17:00, 19 July 2022 (UTC)Reply