This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
Latest comment: 18 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
So he was a member of parliament as 13 colonies declared, and fought for, independence. Which side was he on -- was he with Burke and Fox on the one hand, or North and the crown on the other? --Christofurio20:49, 19 October 2006 (UTC)Reply
Well he, and the other Manners MPs generally, were part of the parliamentary interest headed by the Duke of Rutland. Since Charles Manners, 4th Duke of Rutland was a friend of Pitt and generally opposed the ministry, Manners-Sutton was probably in opposition too. Apparently there was some anticipation, not fulfilled, that some new peerages would be created upon the formation of the Shelburne Ministry, and he was one of those who applied to be considered for one, so presumably he was a Whig in good standing. (George III, Peerage Creations and Politics, 1760-1784, William C. Lowe, The Historical Journal 35 3 (September 1992)) Choess22:57, 19 October 2006 (UTC)Reply