This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I don't understand why the article is headed thus. Two issues: 1. This person generally (always?) signed his work "George Robert Gleig" ("George Gleig" tout court was his father, not himself). 2. To the extent that he's remembered at all, he's remembered first as a writer (especially, but not only, on military topics), then as a soldier, then as a chaplain. Identifying him as "priest" is like identifying the author of Hamlet as "William Shakespeare (landowner)": he was, but that isn't how he is normally identified. I was looking for George Robert Gleig the author of The Subaltern; when Wikipedia redirected me to "George Gleig (priest)", I thought at first that I'd come to the wrong place. Furthermore, "George Gleig (priest)" doesn't differentiate him from his father: his father was also a priest (and, unlike George Robert, is mainly known for being one). Pelamis (talk) 00:44, 25 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Some of the currently listed works were authored not by this writer (George Robert Gleig) but by his father (George Gleig): this further illustrates the need to differentiate the two more clearly than Wikipedia currently does. I also find some of the comments on the works confusing or even unintelligible (e.g., the statement "Original 4 vols translation" after the translation from Brialmont--whatever that is supposed to mean, surely there must be a clearer way to say it). Pelamis (talk) 00:45, 25 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
.svg)
