Talk:Get It Right (Glee cast song)/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: FeuDeJoie (talk) 19:08, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

--FeuDeJoie (talk) 19:08, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Obviously you saw my review before, (got your message) and looking through it the changes you have made seem to have developed the article correctly. I will be looking through it in more detail tomorrow but the bets are that it is going to become a GA.

Prose

Article is generally well written;

Introduction

• The sentence "who produced the song, with his wife, Nikki Hassman," is there need for repetitive commas - "who produced the song with his wife Nikki Hassman". Edit punctuation Microsoft Word grammar check flagged this as incorrect also. --Done.

Background

• Same problem as above with the second sentence in the section.--Better
• The remainder of the section is very well written and punctuation is excellent.

Composition

• Well written, no obvious problems.

Critical reception

• Voerding, Who is this? You have previously discussed him in the composition section but for a first time reader it seems as if he is a random person as no publisher is listed in this section only in the composition section. It is confusing. Add more detail.
• Other than listed above the section is easy to read, factual and understandable.--Done

Chart performance

• Chart positions need its own section change positions to a separate section: Charts.--Done
• Well written, factual and clear.

Factually accurate?

• No problems; no outstanding references needed, no original research and all notable.

Coverage

• Factual, doesn't waffle and everything is relevant.

Neutral

• Not biased, Critical reception show a good mix of responses.

Stable

• No edit wars. Stable.

References

Critical reception

• Reference 5 Seattle Post-Intelligencer, it is repeated twice in one continuous sentence. Why? --Done.

Overall

All the issues have been met, I will pass this now. Thanks for the changes.

Thank you for taking the time to conduct a second review. Much appreciated! Frickative 01:09, 11 July 2011 (UTC)