Talk:Epsilon Crucis

orange giant?

Wouldn't a K class star br an orange dwarf? Cheers, :) MikeReichold 15:15, 27 December 2006 (UTC) Corrected my ignorance. Cheers, :) MikeReichold 15:59, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

Deleted "original reserch" by Richontaban.

"juxta Crucem" is appearently in a lyric from the hymn Stabat Mater. But it is not connected with this star. See Stabat Mater#Text and translation.--Bay Flam 14:04, 16 June 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bay Flam (talk • contribs)

Distance ?

With a parallax of 14.3 mas shouldn't the distance be 227.97 ly? Ian Christie —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ianchristie (talk • contribs) 02:24, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Epsilon Crucis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090628101130/http://www.fotw.net/flags/br_astro.html to http://www.fotw.net/flags/br_astro.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:10, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Requested move 9 August 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: no consensus. (closed by non-admin page mover) Calidum 02:36, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

---

• Ginan (star) → Epsilon Crucis
• Imai (star) → Delta Crucis
• Gacrux → Gamma Crucis
• Mimosa (star) → Beta Crucis
• Acrux → Alpha Crucis

– The titles of several articles about stars in the constellation Crux were recently moved from being titled with their Bayer designations to being titled with proper names. The moves were made (on 25 April 2019) as reverts of undiscussed moves with the rationale that the proper names were now approved by the IAU. This basis was somewhat misleading: Alpha, Beta, and Gamma Crucis were renamed in 2006, and for 13 years nobody had a problem; Delta Crucis had never been called Imai or Imai (star), although it was titled Decrux until 2009; and Epsilon Crucis had never been named Ginan or Ginan (star) (originally titled Juxta Crucem!). In any case, now is a good time to have a discussion. I have included all five star articles that were renamed, hopefully that doesn't become too confusing.

Based on WP:TITLE, the title of the article should reflect the most recognisable and commonly-used name for the subject of the article. I'm not in the southern hemisphere so clearly not the best judge, but I would contend that the most recognisable names for Epsilon and Delta are certainly not the proper names, and it is arguable whether the proper names for Alpha, Beta, and Gamma are really the most recognisable and widely-used. I would propose that all five be moved back to their Bayer designations. Lithopsian (talk) 13:53, 9 August 2019 (UTC)--Relisting. Cúchullain ^t/c 14:55, 16 August 2019 (UTC) --Relisting. — Newslinger talk 04:32, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

Split opinion Acrux, Mimosa, and Gacrux are at least recognizable as a potential common name - I've heard all three of these names being used. I've never heard of Imai or Ginan before. ― Дрейгорич / Dreigorich Talk 02:56, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 6 April 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Vpab15 (talk) 17:36, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

---

Ginan (star) → Epsilon Crucis – The name "Ginan" has not come into widespread use for this star. There are hits at web pages based on Wikipedia and some other popular sites, a few hits in books, mostly related to history and indigenous astronomy, almost none in scientific publications. The article was renamed from the title Epsilon Crucis in 2018. See also the previous group requested move on this page and Requested move 16 October 2021 for related discussions about the preferred titles for the main stars of Crux. Lithopsian (talk) 16:40, 6 April 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. 🐶 EpicPupper ^{(he/him | talk)} 20:30, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Note: WikiProject Astronomy has been notified of this discussion. 🐶 EpicPupper ^{(he/him | talk)} 20:32, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Support - I don't see this name commonly used as much as other star names like Rasalhague, Antares etc. As a response seen from Talk:Alpha Ophiuchi, I'm guessing Epsilon Crucis is used more in sources and people may think this is a more understandable name as to where that star is located. I was also thinking "Rasalhague" would be the article title of Alpha Ophiuchi myself but others don't think that is a well known star compared to others that we see. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 21:00, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.