Talk:Glass Mountain (magazine)

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Notability

edit

Two different editors have tagged this article with a "notability" tag, because the article at this point is not establishing the notability of its subject. One anonymous IP insists on removing this tag, stating that the magazine is of "national importance". Unfortunately, that is not visible from the article. There is 1 external link (the magazine's homepage, announcing the national premiere of the journal) and 3 references including one from an .edu cource. Another is a reputed university newsletter and does not contribute anything to establish notability. The other one is a news article entry posted by a "digital journalist" by a company based in Canada. If no sources will be forthcoming, I'm tempted to take this to AfD (and that's a tag that cannot be removed and if the outcome would be "delete" it will be very difficult to re-create an article in the future). --Crusio (talk) 18:45, 9 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Multiple secondary references provided, meets WP:NOTABILITY, tag removed. Postoak (talk) 22:19, 15 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Glass Mountain (magazine). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:44, 12 January 2017 (UTC)Reply