Talk:Gliese 581c/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Davidbuddy9 Talk  04:06, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Reviewing this revision (click)

Review

1. It is reasonably well written.

   Pass

   The lead paragraph is a nice read and it definitely seems to be polished.

   The sub-section Mass (under Physical characteristics) says clarification needed. But I don't see how this could be clarified more the sentence makes sense and is understandable already. So remove the clarification needed tag.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):

   Under Liquid Water, add that citation from MOST used in the second last paragraph in Radius That justifies no transits.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   Recent edits have been mostly constructive so far of all edits made in 2016 to this article only 1 edit has been flagged as vandalism or testing but the edit itself didn't seem like vandalism altough the space between 581 and c should be there.:

6. It is illustrated by two images, all of which are WP:AIAO compliant.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail: - Pass, polished lead, one citation that needs to be carried over and one tag needs to be removed.

• I have made all the fixes needed in this edit. Davidbuddy9 Talk  04:09, 3 April 2016 (UTC)