Talk:Workhuman

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Globoforce. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131205134905/http://www.greatplacetowork.com/publications-and-events/press/2281-great-place-to-workr-announces-2013-best-small-a-medium-workplaces-list to http://www.greatplacetowork.com/publications-and-events/press/2281-great-place-to-workr-announces-2013-best-small-a-medium-workplaces-list

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:24, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Globoforce. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://archive.is/20131006110945/http://www.masshightech.com/stories/2005/06/27/story4-Online-reward-program-builder-Globoforce-hopes-US-move-will-pay-off.html to http://www.masshightech.com/stories/2005/06/27/story4-Online-reward-program-builder-Globoforce-hopes-US-move-will-pay-off.html
• Added archive https://archive.is/20131006110945/http://www.masshightech.com/stories/2005/06/27/story4-Online-reward-program-builder-Globoforce-hopes-US-move-will-pay-off.html to http://www.masshightech.com/stories/2005/06/27/story4-Online-reward-program-builder-Globoforce-hopes-US-move-will-pay-off.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:50, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Adding notable sources

Hello, dear authors. The standards of notability for companies now are more vigorous than they were in the past, and unfortunately your article lacks reference to independent and reliable resources. Please see the criteria here: WP:NCORP#Primary criteria. The references currently used in the article are either outdated or look more as listings and sent-out PR materials, than real in depth coverage. I recommend you to look at modern standards and update your article with new references. Otherwise the article could be a subject for Wikipedia:Proposed deletion. Best regards, —unexpositive (unexpositive) 15:58, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

"In The News" section

This section reads more like marketing describing a company as a great place to work, and not really any significant news concerning the company itself. Should this section be retained? PseudoOne (talk) 15:47, 2 November 2019 (UTC)