Talk:Glock Ges.m.b.H.
 | Glock Ges.m.b.H. was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Video
editChanged the name on the video, as the gun showcased is not a G18, but rather a modified GLOCK (probably a G19).
Gaston Glock's military history...or lack thereof
editWhy is this important to the article? He "spent a few days" in a German Army camp? That does not constitute service, any more than my son is an Air Force veteran because he comes to the base with me. The only thing that I can think of is that it somehow associates him with the Nazis.
"Gaston Glock Service in German Army During World War II" is a misleading header at best, and since it is irrelevant I am removing it.
Re: "third-party conversion kits for .22LR" in the handguns products section
editGlock recently came out with the Glock 44, which is chambered in .22LR https://us.glock.com/en/pistols/g44
The current phrasing makes it sound like there's no proprietary .22LR Glock pistol. Drbogatyr (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 01:03, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
Horses
edithttp://www.ghpc.at/en/at/home/ I get that not many people know Glock is in the horse business but I feel like it'd be worth mentioning. Flixxy0 (talk) 06:56, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
Necessity of field knife & entrenching tool subsections/specifications?
editBoth subsections are sourced entirely from Glock's catalog and a Glock dealer, and my initial search doesn't turn up any reliable sources discussing them. As it stands, they both read an awfully lot like blatant advertising, so unless anyone can show me why I'm mistaken, I think both subsections should be deleted. The existing mentions in the lede seem to me to be enough for products that are made by a notable company, but aren't notable in themselves. Librarian of Sand (talk) 00:18, 12 March 2024 (UTC)