Talk:Gojek

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Indonesia Low‑importance

	Indonesia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indonesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indonesia and Indonesia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IndonesiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndonesiaTemplate:WikiProject IndonesiaIndonesia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Transport Low‑importance

	Transport portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TransportWikipedia:WikiProject TransportTemplate:WikiProject TransportTransport articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Apps Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apps, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of apps on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AppsWikipedia:WikiProject AppsTemplate:WikiProject Appsapps articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Contribute to the project:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Good article nominations : Improve Application software, Facebook and Instagram to good article status
Stubs : Category:Mobile game stubs, Category:Stub-Class apps articles

Computing: Software Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).

It is requested that an image or photograph of Gojek be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.

Wikipedians in Indonesia may be able to help!

The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Merger proposal

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I propose to merge Coins.ph into Go-Jek per "Go-Jek buys fintech startup Coins.ph for $72M ahead of Philippines expansion". Coins.ph isn't very notable and likely to remain a stub. Џ 09:04, 22 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 22 July 2019

Latest comment: 4 years ago7 comments6 people in discussion

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: page moved. While we don't rely on brand name changes alone, the change in it's usage in reliable sources as pointed out in the discussion, among other things, is sufficient enough to justify this page move. (closed by non-admin page mover) Steven Crossin ^{Help resolve disputes!} 15:21, 18 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Go-Jek → Gojek – Go-Jek's brand name is now simply "Gojek" (without dash) starting from July 22, 2019 following the launch of their new logo. I can't move the page by myself because the new title that I want is currently used as redirect page. Tiktomoro (talk) 05:07, 22 July 2019 (UTC) --Relisting. bd2412 T 01:43, 11 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 12:58, 22 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Tiktomoro, Dicklyon, and Tiktomoro: queried move request Anthony Appleyard (talk) 13:04, 22 July 2019 (UTC)Reply
Too soon. We wait for sources to reflect the new name being adopted. We don't go by logos. Dicklyon (talk) 05:38, 22 July 2019 (UTC)Reply
Maybe the way they write their own brand name in their website can be taken into consideration. The url address become "gojek.com" aswell (from previously "go-jek.com"). Indonesian media (Kompas, Tempo, and CNBC Indonesia) also write "Gojek" instead of "Go-Jek". Tiktomoro (talk)
Support: Seems good enough to me. The company's URL was changed, the website says Gojek, the jackets worn by employees now have no hyphen, and some press articles are using the unhyphenated name too (this, this, this, this, this, and there are more). I see no reason there would be significant resistance to removing the hyphen. —BarrelProof (talk) 17:38, 22 July 2019 (UTC)Reply
Support per above. flixwito ^(•‿•)^ 12:49, 11 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Add topic