Why is this page here?

edit

To me, this is a clear candidate for deletion/merging as Non-notable, non-encyclopedic content.

  • Pieces of art are not inherently notable
  • The artwork is, essentially, an ad for Android
  • All discussion of this artwork is in the context of the OS itself, not in terms of discussing the merits of the art or the like

    This should, at most, be a section of the article on Android. GormtheDBA (talk) 20:07, 10 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

    New Image

    edit

    Looks like you need a new image as Google have added the Gingerbread and Ice Cream Sandwich statues to their lawn since that photo was taken as Android 2.3 + 4.0 were released. I'm not sure if they added one for honeycomb (3.0). Good article though Jenova20 08:54, 28 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

    Bolding and "fastest selling mobile operating system as of late 2010"

    edit

    here is what I removed from the article: "[Google]]'s Android is the fastest selling mobile operating system as of late 2010"

    I removed this for two reason. The first minor reason is that the bolding of "Android" is not needed here. A word is bolded at the beginning of an article for the purpose of highlighting what the article is about or various other names it may be going by. As this article is not about the operating system itself, and the title of the group of statues is already bolded at the beginning of the article there is no need to bold this here. The reason I removed the sentence as a whole is that a) the rate of sale of phones with the Android OS has no bearing on the statues, the number of phones sold may, but not the rate at which they sell does not. This fact is better suited for the Android OS wiki page. And b) this fact is already outdated, and will become more so as the article evolves. Either it will need to be updated every time Google's sales numbers are released or it will become stale and removed due to being outdated.--Found5dollar (talk) 23:20, 31 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

    I didn't know about the bolding.
    Second the figures aren't out of date since sales figures just released (and i can get a source for that) show that even with the new iphone launch, Samsung is still outselling iphone and Android sales are still accelerating.
    It doesn't seem unreasonable to add that statement again without the bolding since it's not a large article and is relevant directly to the "background" section i added it to.
    Thanks Jenova20 09:24, 1 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

    File:Google lawn.jpg Nominated for Deletion

    edit
      An image used in this article, File:Google lawn.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests November 2011
    What should I do?

    Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

    • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
    • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

    This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 03:29, 3 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

    Misinformation about non-existing statues and dessert names for recent Android versions

    edit

    This article has seen repeated attempts from various US-based IPs to add false claims about Google erecting lawn statues for Android 11 and 12, and about alleged dessert names for Android 10, 11 and 12 (e.g. [1] [2] [3], also in contradictory versions - "Quince Tart" vs "Queen Cake" and "Snow Cone" vs. :Sabrina" [4]). These attempts went as far trying to delete referenced statements pointing out that Google had stopped making physical statues [5] and is no longer using code names [6].

    I get it that some Android fans are disappointed that Google stopped using the dessert names. But that doesn't make it OK to try to use Wikipedia to make Google change their mind, or to popularize inofficial names. See Wikipedia:Verifiability.

    Regards, HaeB (talk) 14:25, 27 November 2021 (UTC)Reply