Talk:Guillermo García López

(Redirected from Talk:Guillermo García-López)
Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Requested Move

edit

I would like to move this article to Guillermo Garcia Lopez. This is the common, conventional name for a subject in English. If this article title makes a statement of fact, it is currently "By English convention, the name of this person is Novak Đoković". This statement of fact is verifiably false: the overwhelming majority of citations from all English language sources use "Guillermo Garcia Lopez". For example look at yahoo sport site, Australian open site, sportsline.com, US open site, www.tennis.com... Also look on Novak Djokovic tallk page. There are argumensts for move. I think that we should have same standards for all articles. --Jovanvb (talk) 16:15, 27 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Consistency is not a mandate. Rovingrobert (talk) 02:38, 5 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
Novak has shown that he goes by Djokovic in English. That's how he spells it. You'd have to show that Garcia Lopez spells it that way in English also. Fyunck(click) (talk) 03:43, 5 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Guillermo García López. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:56, 25 October 2017 (UTC)Reply