Talk:HMAS Adelaide (L01)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page has already been boldly moved (except with space between LHD and 01). P.T. Aufrette (talk) 16:55, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

---

HMAS Adelaide (LHD 02) → HMAS Adelaide (LHD01) – I am the webmaster for the Royal Australian Navy. I request that this page be moved (renamed) to reflect a decision made by the RAN in respect to the pennant numbers allocated to the two ships in the Canberra Class. Before a decision was made in regards to the pennant numbers, speculation was that HMAS Canberra (III) would be LHD01 as she is the lead ship in the class and HMAS Adelaide (III) would therefore be LHD02. This is not the case. It was decided that both ships would retain their pennant numbers from their previous Adelaide Class i.e. HMAS Adelaide is LHD01 and HMAS Canberra is LHD02. I have edited the article accordingly but am not able to move the page.Navywebmaster (talk) 00:36, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

• Comment don't you want to move HMAS Canberra (LHD 01) as well? -- 76.65.128.252 (talk) 00:21, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

• Webmaster response. Yes, that is appropriate. Please refer to the Canberra Class page on the official Navy website at http://www.navy.gov.au/Canberra_Class#Ships for further confirmation. Cheers Ash, Navy Webmaster. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Navywebmaster (talk • contribs) 08:32, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

• I've undone Navywebmaster's edits to HMAS Canberra (LHD 01) and HMAS Adelaide (LHD 02) for the moment, only so that the article's remain consistent with their current titles until such a move is made. As Navywebmaster has said, there has been a lot of speculation and confusion over which ships will receive which pennant numbers (see earlier discussions at Talk:HMAS Canberra (LHD 01)#Pennant number and Talk:Canberra class landing helicopter dock#Pennant number switcheroo). Its good that the RAN has come to a to a decision, and is committing to the "match the frigates" pennant number scheme. Now, what we need is a recent, reliable, published source (for example but not limited to: Defence press release, news article on the Navy website or in the wider media) for WP:Verifiability purposes; one that contains a clear statement from the RAN that "Yes, Adelaide will be 01 and Canberra will be 02" (preferably one that continues "This is counter-intuitive considering the order they are coming into service, but we're doing it because we want the LHD pennants to match the FFGs"). Show us that, and I'll do the heavy lifting myself :) -- saberwyn 10:27, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

  And on consideration, what I've done above is silly. What I want is reliable published sources discussing the use of pennant numbers in relation to these ships. What I have is the the website of the official body operating thise ships using the 'frigate' numbers in fragmentary but important locations locations (the table of ships on the class 'article' and in the infobox of each ship's 'article). This is sufficient to justify the relevant pagemoves, so I've been bold and moved Adelaide and Canberra to the appropriate pennants, and have begun to update the incoming links. -- saberwyn 08:31, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

  P.S.: please note that I've placed a space between the LHD and the 01/02 instead of at the unspaced version suggested above, as current practice on Wikipedia, based on other sources (including the abovementioned RAN webpages), is to render RAN pennants with a space between the letters and the numbers. -- saberwyn 08:39, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on HMAS Adelaide (L01). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.navy.gov.au/w/images/Semaphore_2007_14.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110706124110/http://www.aspi.org.au/publications/publication_details.aspx?ContentID=55&pubtype=6 to http://www.aspi.org.au/publications/publication_details.aspx?ContentID=55&pubtype=6

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:11, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Initial Problems

The ship had some problems after delivery, that took some 12 months to fix. The RAN would not say what the issues were. Any ideas?193.116.124.192 (talk) 01:13, 4 January 2019 (UTC)