Talk:HMS Keith
 | HMS Keith has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the HMS Keith article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
.svg)
Copyright problem removed
editPrior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.naval-history.net/xGM-Chrono-10DD-14B-Keith.htm. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:32, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
A couple of suggestions
editLooks pretty good for B class, IMO. I have a couple of comments/suggestions. Firstly, the lead mentions that the ship was involved in enforcing a blockade during the Spanish Civil War, but this isn't really covered in the body. It probably should be (probably only needs a clause added to what is alrady there). Also, there are two sources in the References (Lenton and March), which don't appear to be specifically cited. Anyway, good work. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:09, 23 November 2011 (UTC)