Talk:HD 192310

Planetary system

one new second planet it's been found around HD 192310 (HR 7722) The HARPS search for Earth-like planets in the habitable zone: I -- Very low-mass planets around HD20794, HD85512 and HD192310 http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1108/1108.3447v1.pdf — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.78.69.104 (talk) 01:22, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

I don't care about the etiquette of not replying to old observations. This hasn't aged well. Hardly very "low" mass, it's amazing what academia hypes up to get funds. My point is really no comment needed to be made in Talk; and what you say simply perpetuates an overblown opinion.- Adam37 Talk 16:57, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

"Suspected, but unconfirmed"

The unsourced sentence, "HR 7722 is suspected of being a variable star, but this is unconfirmed", seems to unnecessarily cast aspersions on this star. If the accusation of variability cannot be proven or even documented with a source, I suggest that this be removed from the Wikipedia article. This site at least has the balls to come right out and call the star a "variable", without any sneaking suspicions or tiptoeing around the issue. Is that site a reliable source? If so, let's get tough, and call this star out for what it is -- a variable. - I'm not that crazy (talk) 13:50, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Requested move 09 February 2014

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved. EdJohnston (talk) 01:32, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

---

HR 7722 → HD 192310 – Appears to be the most commonly-used name, as seen by a Google Scholar search and a SIMBAD search. Relisted to allow reply to the oppose vote below. Andrewa (talk) 06:58, 17 February 2014 (UTC) StringTheory11 (t • c) 17:56, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

• Comment I notice that it is also Gliese 785, did you do a comparative search on that? (or its variant forms) -- 70.24.244.161 (talk) 06:22, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Yes. StringTheory11 (t • c) 18:31, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
• Oppose. No evidence is presented to support the assertions in the nominations. If those assertions are correct, please post the links so that other editors can verify them. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 05:47, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Here's the relevant links: Object on SIMBAD, HR 7722 on GS, Gliese 785 on GS (all variations) (note many unrelated results), and HD 192310 on GS. — Preceding unsigned comment added by StringTheory11 (talk • contribs)

• Support. Thank you for the evidence, StringTheory11. Andrewa (talk) 19:15, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
• Support. HD more widely used in general. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 08:35, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Discussion

Any additional comments:

I'm sorry to delay this another week, I considered closing this as move under WP:SNOW, but BrownHairedGirl does have a valid point and so I couldn't claim even a rough consensus without voting myself. Still probably a line call. Hang in there, all, and thank you StringTheory11. Andrewa (talk) 19:15, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.