Talk:Hadley–Apennine
 | Hadley–Apennine has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Size of Hadley Rille
editThe article states 'Rima Hadley ranges in depth between 600 and 900 feet (180 and 270 m), but is approximately 1,200 feet (370 m) deep at the Apollo 15 landing site'. Presumably either the second or third figure is wrong as the depth at the landing site can't be more than the maximum depth... Stub Mandrel (talk) 15:19, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
- @Stub Mandrel: I just had a look at the reference for that statistic and saw that the source used the word "generally" to indicate that the depth of the rille is generally within that range, but can and does deviate from that range in a few places (i.e. the Apollo 15 site). I've tweaked the sentence a bit to clarify this. Good find. Tyrol5 [Talk] 13:24, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hadley–Apennine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111215194754/http://www.boomslanger.com/images/apollo_over_the_moon.pdf to http://www.boomslanger.com/images/apollo_over_the_moon.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:16, 27 October 2017 (UTC)