Talk:Hallucination (song)/GA1

GA Review

Latest comment: 2 years ago7 comments2 people in discussion

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 06:18, 11 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )

3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

~~Keep the note in the infobox so it is know this was on the streaming version only, but add (deluxe) after the album title~~
~~"British band Years & Years. It was included on the" → "British band Years & Years from the"~~
~~"and wrote it with" → "and served as a co-writer with"~~
~~Imany should not be linked twice in the lead; either do it on the first occasion or the second, depending on whether the reference or her being mentioned by name is more important~~
~~""Hallucination" is a 80's-inspired" → "it is a 80's-inspired"~~
~~Pipe four-on-the-floor to Four on the floor (music)~~
~~"with its lyrics" → "with the lyrics"~~
~~"received widespread acclaim" → "received generally positive reviews" per the body~~
~~"lyrics, nature as well as" → "lyrics and nature as well as Years & Years's"~~
~~Are you sure the link on Commonwealth of Independent States is needed?~~

~~"and wrote it with" → "and co-wrote it with"~~
~~Pipe four-on-the-floor to Four on the floor (music)~~
~~Again, should Imany be linked on the first or second instance?~~
~~Why have you written that it contains an interpolation when all the sources mention a sample?~~
~~"all of its facets." → "all of the facets."~~
~~[10] has no usage after the quote; shouldn't you invoke [6] instead since that mentions it like [9] does?~~

Any thematic order here for the reviews?
- I restructured the reviews, are you fine with it? Iaof2017 (talk) 13:21, 12 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
~~The Wyspa.fm source uses the word flawlessly, rather than unabashedly~~
~~"writing that "['the song'] is a perfect track" → "writing that it "is a perfect song" per the source's wording~~
~~Are you sure the link on Commonwealth of Independent States is needed?~~
~~Mention that the position in New Zealand was on the New Zealand Hot Singles Chart~~
~~"as well as number 28 on" → "and number 28 on"~~

~~Per both being one para, couldn't you merge this with the above section and retitle to Reception and promotion?~~
~~"For promotion, an accompanying music video for" → "For promotion, a music video for"~~
What do you mean by overview of the latter and where is the part of the sentence after the comma sourced?

~~I'm not sure if you should use the term "observers" when only one source is invoked~~
Italicise Black Mirror
Italicise Squid Game
~~Przemysław Kokot's surname should only be used since you introduced him previously~~
~~"to an 1980s-inspired" → "to an 80s-inspired" per the source's wording~~

Copyvio score looks decent at 38.7%
~~Why does ref 6 cite New Musical Express instead of just NME when that is what the publication is called nowadays?~~
~~Remove or replace ref 10 since that is an unreliable source owned by Universal~~
~~Cite Promo News as publisher instead on ref 29~~
~~Only cite BBC on ref 32 with the wikilink~~
~~WP:OVERLINK of TopHit on ref 42~~

On hold until all of the issues are fixed! --K. Peake 07:55, 11 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
- Hey @Kyle Peake: thank you for picking up the review. I've responded to all of your concerns above. Cheers! Iaof2017 (talk) 13:07, 12 September 2022 (UTC)Reply