Talk:History of the Catholic Church in Belize

Change of title

Relevant discussion at

→ Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Catholicism#Must we use the word .22Roman.22 in a title like .22History of the Catholic Church in .28a country.29.22.3F

Both the Bishop in Belize and I would prefer that this article retain the name we gave it: History of the Catholic Church in Belize before it was changed by someone at Wikipedia. There are two reasons for this. Since the Second Vatican Council of the Catholic church some 50 years ago there has been emphasis on its being a world church, enculturated into each country where it exists, with liturgy in the vernacular, and more under the control of the local bishop, with less close centralization in Rome. This is also part of the ecumenical efforts of reuniting the Eastern Orthodox and Uniate churches with the Catholic church. This renewed understanding was evidenced when Pope Francis in his first appearance referred to himself as the Bishop of Rome, which is what he is and what progressives in the Catholic church are trying to emphasize in practice. Secondly, so often "-ism" is seen as a put-down, and we would like to avoid being an "ism". If this decision on change of title cannot be immediately reversed and the given name restored to the article, please tell me how/if I might appeal the decision.jzsj 16:19, 13 May 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jzsj (talk • contribs)

I understand what you are saying. I also know that the "-ism" is not a put-down in wikipedia. —BoBoMisiu (talk) 00:44, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Update: to Template - History of the Roman Catholic Church

Greetings, in addition to some article copy-edits, I updated the history template to include Belize. Regards, JoeHebda (talk) 22:13, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Updates for article Sections

Greetings, Today I completed numerous updates to this article's Section titles. For example, the Historical periods section had only one " = " so it is changed to two " == " as the level one is reserved for the article's title & should not be used within the article. This is per MOS - Layout. (see Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Layout#Headings_and_sections). I also moved wikilinks that resided within section titles to the opening sentence of that subsection. There were a couple of Images that were placed on the line before their appropriate section that I moved as the first line of that section. Lastly, I did a few minor copy-edits. Regards, JoeHebda (talk) 13:00, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the info. I'll alter the introduction section to conform to this.jzsj 19:30, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on History of Roman Catholicism in Belize. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150625142206/http://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_decree_19651118_apostolicam-actuositatem_en.html to http://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_decree_19651118_apostolicam-actuositatem_en.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:17, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Catholic Church which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 21:30, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on History of the Catholic Church in Belize. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150402140235/http://www.mjc.edu.bz/ to http://www.mjc.edu.bz/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:31, 5 November 2017 (UTC)