Talk:Hit n Run Phase One
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
Requested move 31 July 2015
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: not moved. Jenks24 (talk) 19:14, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
The Hit & Run Album → HITNRUN – The name of the album was reported incorrectly by the cited source and the source has since changed its information (still cited by the wikipedia page) to reflect the true name of the album: HITNRUN. Rockguitar (talk) 22:00, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose - whatever we call it we won't be using CAPS. Suggest Hit n Run (Prince album) per Hit & Run (Big Sugar album), 2003 Hit and Run (Girlschool album), 1981 Hit and Run (T.S.O.L. album), 1987 Hit & Run (EP), by Sloan In ictu oculi (talk) 06:00, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose MOS:TM/MOS:CAPS -- does not appear to be an acronym -- 67.70.32.190 (talk) 06:33, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
- The requested name ought to redirect to Hit and run (disambiguation) -- 67.70.32.190 (talk) 06:33, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Aside from the MOSCAPS issue, there are no reliable sources for "HITNRUN" yet. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 09:07, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
- Comment if supported I would have no objection to HITNRUN (foo bar). GregKaye 13:32, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Requested move 12 August 2015
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved to Hit n Run (Prince album). Jenks24 (talk) 11:26, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
The Hit & Run Album → ? – Title confirmed as HITNRUN, but I don't know enough about the MOS of page titles to know what this should be moved to. I'm guessing Hit n Run (Prince album)? The only album I own that I can think of with a similar issue is Year Zero Remixed, which has the "styled as" text in the intro. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 18:36, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
- Move to Hit n Run (Prince album) as cover artwork. In ictu oculi (talk) 19:12, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
- Move to HITNRUN (Prince album) as stated in the BBC article.warpozio (talk) 19:20, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Looks like Hit n Run (Prince album) is the correct naming convention. Compare with LOtUSFLOW3R, for example. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 13:11, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
- Comment when this is renamed the current title should redirect to Hit and run (disambiguation) -- 67.70.32.190 (talk) 04:44, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Which title?
editTemplate:Prince albums talks about HITNRUN Phase One, Prince chronology calls it HitnRun and the article is called Hit n Run (Prince album). Which one is correct? warpozio (talk) 15:19, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Redirects
editI created the following redirects, which may be used if any of the songs become notable enough for their own article:
Sources
edit- "Paisley Overground: Prince’s Best Pop Record in a Decade Is Hiding on Tidal" by ALEX PAPPADEMAS
- "New Prince Album: Will “HitNRun” Satisfy Purple Purists?" By SUN SINGLETON
- "HITnRUN Phase One by Prince: EW review" BY KYLE ANDERSON
- "4.5" By Seth Colter Walls
- "Prince goes retro on 'HITNRUN Phase One,' released on new-fangled streaming service, Tidal: Review" BY JIM FARBER
- "Prince shoots for a new purple patch with HITnRUN" by Liam Viney
- "Prince Is Trying to Stop Time" by SPENCER KORNHABER
- "Sign o' the times: Prince pulls from EDM on 'HitNRun Phase One'" By MIKAEL WOOD
- "‘HITNRUN Phase One’: Prince Finds a 25-Year-Old Collaborator, Shreds, But Mostly Falls Flat" BY MATTHEW ISMAEL RUIZ
- "Review: Prince's new album is hit and miss" By Jon Bream
- "Prince's New Album Is a Huge Miss" BY CHRIS GERARD
- "Prince crashes and burns on HITNRUN Phase One" By Abigail Covington
- "Prince Releases New Album HITNRUN Phase One On Tidal" by RYAN FRICKE
- "A few quick thoughts on Prince's just-released album, 'HitNRun Phase One'" By Jon Bream
- "Album of the Week: 'HitNRun' hits Prince's many facets" by Arienne Thompson
- "Prince – HITNRUN Phase One first listen review: 'His most experimental and shapeshifting album in years'" by Dave Simpson
- "Review: On ‘HitNRun Phase One,’ Prince Plays Well With Others" By JON PARELES
- "Signal o' the occasions: Prince pulls from EDM on 'HitNRun Part One'" By Times Staff
- "Prince Raises Pop Crown In ‘HITnRun’ Tidal Exclusive" by Phoebe Fico
- "PRINCE CONTINUES SHAPESHIFTING ON ALBUM NO. 35" by Mike Pizzo
- "Princes musikalske Midas touch" by Mads Hendrich (in Danish)
Moved from article. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 16:55, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Requested move 14 December 2015
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: move to Hit n Run Phase One (non-admin closure). sst✈(discuss) 05:35, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
Hit n Run (Prince album) → HITnRUN phase one – There are 2 HITnRUN albums by Prince. The name Hit_n_Run_(Prince_album) is confusing as it is not clear which one is meant. Secondly the second album has the clear name HITnRUN phase two. It would be logical if the first one would be called HITnRUN phase one warpozio (talk) 11:47, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- Support warpozio (talk) 12:11, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose per WP:MOS if anything this will be Hit n Run Phase One vs Hit n Run Phase Two per cover artwork and per the more serious sources in the footnotes/refs to the article. In ictu oculi (talk) 16:14, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- Would you support a move to Hit n Run Phase One? warpozio (talk) 17:46, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- Support But with phase one capitalized so it'll be HITnRUN Phase One. Dash9Z (talk) 07:02, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
- Per In ictu oculi, I think Hit n Run Phase One would be the best title. Capitalisation in sources is all over the place so it would be better to follow our style guide. Jenks24 (talk) 11:51, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
- If the words "HIT" and "RUN" aren't going to be all capitalize, "Hit n Run" should still be one word so it'll be titled HitnRun Phase One. Dash9Z (talk) 22:48, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
- Support (User:Djfunkfunk) But shouldn't the correct name be: 'Hitnrun Phase One' and 'Hitnrun Phase Two'? Just like the track 'Funknroll' on the 'Art Official Age' album? Or shoudl it be 'HitnRun' like 'RocknRoll Love Affair' on the 'Phase Two' album? In my opinion we should use one rule for all. Either 'Hitnrun', 'Funknroll', 'Rocknroll' or 'HitnRun', 'FunknRoll', 'RocknRoll'. I could support 'HITnRUN', because it is written that way on the album cover, but if we do that it, 'Phase One' and 'Phase Two' should be written 'phase one' and 'phase two' and we could argue that the tracks on the album should all be capitalized which I would oppose. DJ FunkFunk 07:49, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- The site Princevault.com calls it Hitnrun Phase One (stylized as HITnRUN Phase One
- Support off of the basis of consistency and continuation. (FWIW, iTunes has the albums titled as HITNRUN Phase One HITNRUN Phase Two) --MaJic (comments go here) 18:12, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- Comment: see also Talk:HITnRUN Phase Two#Requested move 14 December 2015. Peco Wikau (talk) 21:57, 17 December 2015 (UTC).
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.