Talk:Homepage hijacking
(Redirected from Talk:Homepage hijack)
Latest comment: 12 years ago by M0rphzone in topic (Good) hijacking information ?
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Homepage hijacking redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 2008-01-11. The result of the discussion was keep. |
Advertisement
editThis page looks like an advertisement of Hijackthis. 195.131.148.102 14:17, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
- Agreed. It also does not read like an encyclopaedic article. I'll try and tag it. Mouse Nightshirt 23:59, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
I'm looking for information about it (...) and I've found these: HijackThis, Microsoft Antispyware ... advertisements / wiki - advertisements.
- It's my conclusion after my reading. Cfr above (2006): "This page looks like an advertisement of HijackThis."
- Searching: (Google.com) Results 1 - 10 of about 199,000 for hijack wikipedia; Results 1 - 100 of about 204,000 for hijack wikipedia; Results 701 - 748 of about 204,000 for hijack wikipedia.
- Google → http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homepage_hijack (This one, you're reading), 2nd HijackThis, (1st & 2nd are these ones)
- versus Hijacking
- Redirected from Hijack
- Searching: (Google.com) Results 1 - 10 of about 199,000 for hijack wikipedia; Results 1 - 100 of about 204,000 for hijack wikipedia; Results 701 - 748 of about 204,000 for hijack wikipedia.
- My other question is: At he begining of this TALK, there is: Skip to table of contents I don't understand its meaning because it's a broken link.
I've looked at the message: This article was nominated for deletion on 2008-01-11. The result of the discussion was keep. Ciao --PLA y Grande Covián (talk) 10:59, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
- Regarding the Talk page comment, did you see the second link to the discussion for the article deletion that was proposed on January 11, 2008? The red link is unimportant. In fact, I've removed the wikilink as it is a bit useless. The Skip to table of contents link works only when there is an actual table of contents (it appears when there are more than 3 headings on a page). - M0rphzone (talk) 02:22, 19 April 2012 (UTC)