Talk:How to Blow Up a Pipeline/GA1

Latest comment: 2 years ago by GhostRiver in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GhostRiver (talk · contribs) 20:53, 4 January 2022 (UTC)Reply


Hello! I'll be taking a look at this article for the January 2022 GAN backlog drive. If you haven't already signed up, please feel free to join in! Although QPQ is not required, if you're feeling generous, I also have a list of GA nominations of my own right here.

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )
3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked   are unassessed

Infobox and lede

edit
  • Comma after "In the book"
    • Done
  • "criticizes pacifism within the climate movement as well as "climate fatalism" outside it." → "criticizes both pacifism within the climate movement and "climate fatalism" outside of it."
    • Done
  • Delink pacifism and sabotage in the second paragraph, as they were already linked above
    • Done

Background

edit
  • Don't use "spring 2018" as a descriptor, per MOS:SEASON
  • Same with "summer of the same year"
    • These are Malm's own fault, since they're from an interview with him. I switched to "in the first half of 2018" and "later that year" since he's almost certainly referring to Northern Hemisphere seasons.
  • ""was in total despair mode."" → ""was in total depair mode"." per MOS:LQ
    • Done
  • "expected to be arguing" → "expected to argue"
    • Done
  • Verso Books should be linked in the body
    • Done

Synopsis

edit

Learning from Past Struggles

edit
  • Delink "non-violence", as it has already been linked above
    • Done

Breaking the Spell

edit
  • ""long and venerable tradition of sabotaging fossil fuel infrastructure,"" → ""long and venerable tradition of sabotaging fossil fuel infrastructure"," per MOS:LQ
    • Done
  • ""insufficient politicisation of the climate crisis."" → ""insufficient politicisation of the climate crisis"." per MOS:LQ
    • Done
  • ""we must insist on it being different in kind from the violence that hits a human (or an animal) in the face,"" → ""we must insist on it being different in kind from the violence that hits a human (or an animal) in the face"," per MOS:LQ
    • Done

Fighting Despair

edit
  • ""an eminently understandable emotional response to the crisis, but unserviceable as a response for a politics in it."" → ""an eminently understandable emotional response to the crisis, but unserviceable as a response for a politics in it"." per MOS:LQ
    • Done
  • Continued LQ issues throughout: even if the end of a sentence is included in the quote, the period should only be inside the quote if the entire sentence is being quoted
    • Done

Reception

edit

Reviews

edit
  • LQ issues noted above
    • Done
  • "for blowing anything up" → "for creating explosions" as both a paraphrase and to avoid ending a sentence with a preposition
    • Done

By notable figures

edit
  • Good outside of LQ issues noted above
    • Issues fixed

Opposition

edit
  • LQ issues noted above
    • Issues fixed
  • No comma needed after "in September 2021" unless you swap "and spoke" for "speaking"
    • Removed
  • No need to add the specification about the New Yorker Radio Hour in the third paragraph, as it was already detailed in the second
    • Removed and reworded

Cover

edit
  • Good

References

edit
  • Good

General comments

edit
  • Images are properly licensed and relevant
  • No stability concerns in the revision history
  • Earwig tweaked out on me, but considering most of the quotes are direct, I'm going to AGF

That's all from me! Mostly minor, quick issues. Ping me with questions, and let me know when you're finished! — GhostRiver 16:02, 7 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks so much for the review and especially the MOS:LQ lessons, GhostRiver! Changes made. ezlev (user/tlk/ctrbs) 17:59, 7 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
I feel that LQ only really makes sense after you've had to correct yourself over and over (like lots of our MOS quirks). In any case, everything looks good on my end, passing now! — GhostRiver 16:56, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply