Talk:Hugh Despenser the Elder

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hugh Despenser the Elder article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Biography: Military / Peerage and Baronetage / Politics and Government / Royalty and Nobility

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Peerage and Baronetage.
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility.

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

English Royalty Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject English Royalty. For more information, visit the project page.English RoyaltyWikipedia:WikiProject English RoyaltyTemplate:WikiProject English RoyaltyEnglish royalty articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Biography / British / European / Medieval C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500)

Untitled

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

He lived to 100 years of age?! Why was he appointed to all these positions when he was in his 80's and 90's? Apparently he was 60 when his son was born... This seems only just on this side of possible... Clarification anybody? 222.153.76.14

Dates appear to have been fixed? Link through to DNB article on Wikisource added to references. Smd49 (talk) 06:13, 30 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Maybe a little addition to keep confusion to a minimum:

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

When Isabella and her lover, Roger Mortimer, led a rebellion against her husband Edward, they captured both Despensers—first the elder, later the younger. Queen Isabella interceded for Hugh the elder, but his enemies, notably Roger Mortimer and Henry, Earl of Lancaster, insisted both father and son should face trial and execution.

When I read this I thought "Boy, must've been love for Isabella to have her husband and son treated like that." and didn't think anything more of it. It wasn't until I read a different page that it dawned on me that QUEEN Isabella was meant at the beginning of the paragraph. I do realize that she is mentioned at the end of this one, and at the end of the section before this, but a too casual reading (like I did) can definitely cause some confusion because both his wife and his queen are named Isabella. A simple addition of "Queen" in front of the first "Isabella" in this paragraph would probably help with that.

79.225.8.141 (talk) 17:06, 14 March 2013 (UTC) RhondaReply

Add topic