Talk:Humanist Manifesto I

Latest comment: 8 months ago by Isochrone in topic Copyright problem removed

"rendering the first manifesto a historic document only."

edit

Um, sorry? --153.9.7.77 (talk) 18:55, 30 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

I removed this phrase for three reasons. First, saying that Human Manifesto I is historic only incorrectly suggests the other manifestos are not historical in nature. All of the manifestos are historic documents. They have all been created at particular moments in history. They all reflect the views of the authors and signers at particular moments in history. Second, saying that Humanist Manifesto I is historic only suggests the other manifestos are something more than historic. What is this something more? Divine inspiration? Third, saying that Humanist Manifesto I is historic only implies that its content is out-of-date...that it is something believed in times past but no longer believed today. This is definitely a personal point of view. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.214.42.64 (talk) 04:38, 29 June 2010 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Humanist Manifesto I. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:48, 10 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Humanist Manifesto I. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:01, 8 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

The linked magazine is published in the UK and, although founded in 1885, has only had that name since 1972. The New Humanist which published HM1 was edited in Chicago by Edwin H Wilson, one of the authors and signees of HM1. Sorry to say, I do not have more information about that magazine. As far as I could learn, the two magazines are conflated [almost?] everywhere on the internet. Jocanfan (talk) 22:20, 17 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

edit

  Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://americanhumanist.org/what-is-humanism/manifesto1/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. – Isochrone (talk) 00:40, 29 March 2024 (UTC)Reply