Talk:Hurricane Dalilia
Hurricane Dalilia has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
Hurricane Dalilia is part of the 1989 Pacific hurricane season series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Orphaned references in Hurricane Dalilia (1989)
editI check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Hurricane Dalilia (1989)'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "CPHC":
- From 1989 Pacific hurricane season: "The 1989 Central Pacific Tropical Cyclone Season". Central Pacific Hurricane Center. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. May 4, 2007. Retrieved May 26, 2009.
- From Tropical cyclone: "Observations". Central Pacific Hurricane Center. 2006-12-09. Retrieved 2009-05-07.
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 06:14, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Hurricane Dalilia (1989)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: 12george1 (talk · contribs) 03:22, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
- "The storm accelerated, headed directly towards the Hawaiian Islands." - This sentence would read better if you put the word "and" between the comma and "headed".
- "the island chain recived more" - Typo
- "While tracking near the Hawaiian islands," - Capitalization error; capital "I" on "islands"
- "northwestern Hawaiian islands" - Same as directly above
- On reference #2, switch "Case" to "Robert Case"
- All fixed. Thanks for the review. YE Pacific Hurricane 03:30, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
- Ok then. I will pass this article.--12george1 (talk) 16:31, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
- All fixed. Thanks for the review. YE Pacific Hurricane 03:30, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
Requested move 8 February 2017
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Procedural close. Request opened by block-evader. NeilN talk to me 18:00, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Hurricane Dalilia (1989) → Hurricane Dalilia – Only one hurricane named "Dalilia". 219.79.250.146 (talk) 01:10, 8 February 2017 (UTC) --Relisting. SkyWarrior 02:44, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Technically, yes, but in this instance, the name Dalilia was a typo from when the EPHC transferred the storm name list to the NHC, so I'd argue that the intended version of the name was a hurricane in 2013 and 2001. YE Pacific Hurricane 16:55, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support per nom. No need for disambiguation. Laurdecl talk 07:06, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose per YE. Hurricane Dalilia redirects to Tropical Storm Dalila, and some of the other Dalilas may have been more notable than this Dalilia. – Juliancolton | Talk 13:59, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Requested move 21 February 2018
editThis discussion was listed at Wikipedia:Move review on 23 October 2018. The result of the move review was Closed as endorsed. |
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Page moved. (non-admin closure) samee talk 06:07, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
Hurricane Dalilia (1989) → Hurricane Dalilia – Only one storm named "Dalilia" reach hurricane strength. B dash (talk) 02:51, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
- Technically, yes, but in this instance, the name Dalilia was a typo from when the EPHC transferred the storm name list to the NHC, so I'd argue that the intended version of the name was a hurricane in 2013 and 2001. YE Pacific Hurricane 8:55 am, 9 February 2017, Thursday (1 year, 11 days ago) (UTC−8)
- Oppose non reader helpful for an event. In ictu oculi (talk) 09:06, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
- Support Unnecessary disambiguation. Wrongly implying there is another hurricane with this name, as the current title does, is NOT helpful to anyone. --В²C ☎ 02:06, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
- Given that the name was only named such due to a typo, I'd argue that this is a special case. YE Pacific Hurricane 03:02, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
- Classic case for WP:SMALLDETAILS and WP:TWODABS - each is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC of its respective actual name, and can have a hat link to the other. --В²C ☎ 17:26, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
- Given that the name was only named such due to a typo, I'd argue that this is a special case. YE Pacific Hurricane 03:02, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
- Support As the only topic of this name, no need for disambiguation. The hatnote is sufficient for those who are seeking another topic by a different name.--Yaksar (let's chat) 05:47, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.