Talk:Fracking in the United Kingdom
(Redirected from Talk:Hydraulic fracturing in the United Kingdom)
Latest comment: 11 days ago by PutTheKettleOn in topic Environmental impact
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Fracking in the United Kingdom article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6Auto-archiving period: 90 days  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. Their edits to this article were last checked for neutrality on 26-03-2017 by Luther Blissetts. |
 | Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
 | A warning about certain sources There is one source on the subject of Hydraulic fracturing in the United Kingdom that represents a Citogenesis or Circular Reporting risk to Wikipedia as they plagiarize verbatim, directly from Wikipedia.[6] Edits which created that version can be found here and in the following edit from 12 August 2013. The source is 'Nicholas P. Cheremisinoff, Anton Davletshin, edited by Mohit Dayal; (2015) Hydraulic Fracturing Operations: Handbook of Environmental Management Practices, pub. Scrivener Publishing, Berkeley, MA; and should be avoided to prevent a Citogenesis Incident. |
 | Text has been copied to or from this article; see the list below. The source pages now serve to provide attribution for the content in the destination pages and must not be deleted as long as the copies exist. For attribution and to access older versions of the copied text, please see the history links below.
|
Environmental impact
editThis section is very messy and not encyclopedic. Further, the first three references in the section were dead so I have fixed them along with some basic readability changes. I haven't checked the others, but likely some dead links in there too. Crucially, the first reference in the entire page (used 8 times) was dead, which isn't a great advert for the page.
I'm keen to improve this section in a balanced way, my interest being driven by the recent Supreme Court ruling on the Horse Hill facility in Sussex, and the way downstream Scope 3 emissions are accounted in EIAs for fracking projects in the UK.
I'll keep chipping away and may make some larger single edits where content is repetitive and can be brought into a better paragraph. I'll see how I go. Overall, very surprised how undeveloped this section is considering the amount of attention fracking has in the news over the last 10 years. PutTheKettleOn (talk) 10:14, 29 August 2024 (UTC)