Talk:iPod Nano

Product Safety Scandal Category

I suggest that the Product Safety Scandal category be removed. Yes I've heard of Foxconn and I know there may be issues there. --MarsInSVG (talk) 15:07, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

I fail to see what you having "heard of Foxconn" has to do with whether or not this article discusses a product safety scandal. A "product safety scandal" means there was a widespread dangerous defect with the product. Which according to this article, there was, and Apple issued a massive recall. Since this article discusses that, it seems appropriate that this article be in that category. Why do you suggest otherwise? --173.252.44.52 (talk) 06:10, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

7th generation

Due to its outdated model, Apple should have released an 8th generation iPod Nano. Its operating system is outdated. 2602:306:379D:1AA0:F1B5:3999:5FA4:A2D (talk) 00:25, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on IPod Nano. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060821194746/http://www.apple.com:80/environment/design/ to http://www.apple.com/environment/design/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:54, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Screen durability and battery swelling issues

Hi, all. I have split IPod Nano#Reception into two smaller sections, for better readability. Individual paragraphs now follow major timeline events (initial reception, screen durability problems reported, Apple acknowledges publicly).

The section on battery swelling potentially causing the screen to discolor or break is still problematic. I have tagged it as WP:OR for now, with citations requested. I'm sure that the swelling issue _has_ happened, for somebody, probably in early production runs, but there are no sources cited here except an iFixit.com repair guide for replacing the battery.

Because of the amount of time that has passed, and because there are no specific generation(s) mentioned as being affected, my (totally fallible) instinct would be just to remove that whole section. Please chime in if there are reasons why that would be a bad idea. --Ernstkm (talk) 14:45, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

2nd Gen last paragraph

There's a mistake. I think where it says about Apple donating$10 for each red ipod sold to the ProjectRed Initiative. It should be, Product Red https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Product_Red If that's the same thing. Seems to be anyway. Hardly matters i guess but I'm sure the Product Red people might appreciate the link to.. seems to be for a positive cause anyway.. 24.19.141.129 (talk) 10:52, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

That's what it already says; and it's already linked. Best, DFlhb (talk) 02:43, 3 June 2023 (UTC)