Talk:Isobaric tag for relative and absolute quantitation
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Move request
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 19:30, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
ITRAQ → Isobaric tag for absolute and relative quantitation – I don't think "the subject is almost exclusively known by its abbreviation (e.g. NATO and Laser)", as explained at WP:TITLEFORMAT. Not using an acronym would also be consistent with other similar articles like Isotope-coded affinity tag (ICAT) and and Tandem mass tags (TMT). See also my related move request at Talk:SILAC#Move request. –CWenger (^ • @) 22:54, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
- Support for the reasons put forth by nom. The iTRAQ redirect will remain, facilitating unpiped links and searches. TJRC (talk) 23:55, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.