Talk:IiO

(Redirected from Talk:IiO (dance group))
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Cuchullain in topic Requested move 4 January 2016

Does not match

edit

The part in the article about how the name iiO started does not match the one on Nadia's article. Which one is right? (Did it start as 'vaiio' or 'vaio' then an extra 'i' added?) Chinze 04:18, 5 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 30 July 2015

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: withdrawn. Steel1943 (talk) 22:15, 30 July 2015 (UTC)Reply


IiO (dance group)IiO – Please revert this move I made. It seems that this subject is probably the primary topic for its capitalization style. – Steel1943 (talk) 18:22, 30 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:45, 30 July 2015 (UTC)Reply
  • An edit comment to page IiO points out that difference only by letter case, and the similarity (or identity, in sans-serif type) between uppercase 'eye' and lowercase 'ell', make the disambiguater " (dance group)" advisable. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:45, 30 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 4 January 2016

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move. We have a rough consensus that the proposed title is distinct enough from others per WP:SMALLDETAILS. It appears that sources do refer to the subject as "iiO" written that way, and we saw no evidence of anything else being used, obliging us to follow the sources. Additionally, as noted in the discussion, concerns that the title can't be displayed appropriately are mooted by Template:DISPLAYTITLE, which is already used at the article, weakening the two oppose !votes. Cúchullain t/c 14:37, 12 January 2016 (UTC)Reply



IiO (dance group)IiO – Somebody who types in two lower-case "i's" and a capital "O" is obviously doing it for a reason. Unreal7 (talk) 15:36, 4 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Have you ever heard of Template:DISPLAYTITLE? Unreal7 (talk) 01:37, 6 January 2016 (UTC)Reply
  • Leaning toward support: This seems like a pretty strange case, possibly bordering on MOS:TM. Do any reliable sources use a different styling than "iiO" for this topic? Assuming that the answer is "No", regardless of whether we think of it as "IiO" or "iiO", it does seem pretty hard to end up with either of those quirky capitalizations without looking for this topic. None of the other candidates would use that sort of uppercase/lowercase mixture, and that's not a reasonable variation like all-caps or no-caps or capitalizing each word of a phrase. To me, this is a better example of an appropriate use of funny capitalization for disambiguation than most of those listed at WP:DIFFCAPS. —BarrelProof (talk) 02:33, 6 January 2016 (UTC)Reply
  • Comment - "dance group" could be confused with dance troupe. Unreal7 (talk) 14:23, 9 January 2016 (UTC)Reply
  • Support – one letter with different capitalization is sufficient for disambiguation, see for example Ice cube and Ice Cube, Lemon drop and Lemon Drop. sst 08:32, 12 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.