This article is written in Nigerian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, travelled, centre) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nigeria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Nigeria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NigeriaWikipedia:WikiProject NigeriaTemplate:WikiProject NigeriaNigeria articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Festivals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Festivals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FestivalsWikipedia:WikiProject FestivalsTemplate:WikiProject FestivalsFestivals articles
Unfortunately, this was quicker than I expected as I'm going to have to give this a quick fail on the basis of the sourcing (both what is in the article and what is lacking) and content. A short search shows that there's significant academic work existing on the festival, yet none of it is referenced within the article (some examples[1][2][3][4]). There's different sourcing which indicates that the there are multiple origin stories of the festival, yet none of this is elaborated in detail in the article. There's no sense that the performances in the festival are part of a larger dynamic of masquerade in Southeastern Nigeria. Performers in the festival are only men; there's no examination of the gendered divisions of labour around the festival (origins, "justifications", responses). There's information which requires clarification and revision (eg what actually is a "traditional prime minister" in Igbo cosmology? The expression "Igbo race" is inappropriate). Just a very quick check of the references shows three which cannot be considered reliable; one is tagged as a dead link to a tourism website (hellotravel), two mirror the same information (Origin, relevance of Ikeji festival; Ikeji Festival of Arondizuogu). I'm not really sure any tourism website could be considered a reliable (ie independent) source in this case (other than to indicate that there has been ongoing attempts to commercialise the festival). The article in present form is perhaps just start class and requires a substantial reworking before being ready for another GA nomination.
