Talk:Ilamchetchenni

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ilamchetchenni article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Biography: Royalty and Nobility

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility (assessed as Low-importance).

India: Tamil Nadu / History Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Tamil Nadu (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

Tamil civilization (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tamil civilization, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Tamil civilizationWikipedia:WikiProject Tamil civilizationTemplate:WikiProject Tamil civilizationTamil civilization articles

Controversial Contents

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

All the points mentioned in the article about the relationship b/w chola-mauryas are controversial. There is no such Purananuru verse states that Ilamcetcenni had a relationship/fight/defeated with Bindusara. There is a only verse in Purananuru, states that Maurya try to conquer Mokur (City in southern pandyan kingdom) with the Help of Vadugas and Kosar kings and was defeated. And this song also not specifies the names of any kings.

Period mentioned in the article is only supported by Nilakanta Sastri. V. Gurunathan (Doctorate and Researcher in Thanjavur University) rejected this claim in his book[1] and said that these chola-maurya relationships are purely imaginary. So I changed the controversial contents.

1. .^[1]

--Tenkasi Subramanian (talk) 07:35, 27 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

References

^ முனைவர் வ. குருநாதன் (2001, திருவள்ளுவர் ஆண்டு 2032). சங்ககால அரச வரலாறு. தஞ்சாவூர் - 613005: தஞ்சாவூர் தமிழ்ப் பல்கலைக்கழகம். pp. 162–177. {{cite book}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)CS1 maint: location (link) CS1 maint: year (link)

Karikala isn't the successor of Ilamchetchenni

Latest comment: 6 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

As the article states, Ilamchetchenni ruled from 501 BCE - 470 BCE. However in Karikala's article, it says he ruled around 190 CE. This makes these two rulers almost 700 years apart. Prakashs27 (talk) 12:16, 2 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic

[குரு-1] முனைவர் வ. குருநாதன் (2001, திருவள்ளுவர் ஆண்டு 2032). சங்ககால அரச வரலாறு. தஞ்சாவூர் - 613005: தஞ்சாவூர் தமிழ்ப் பல்கலைக்கழகம். pp. 162–177. {{cite book}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)CS1 maint: location (link) CS1 maint: year (link)

[1]