Talk:List of impeachment investigations of United States federal officials

"Acted upon"

The Grant entry does not indicate that any formal resolution was ever made in Congress. Was one? And if not, does it belong?

On the other hand, perhaps any request or declaration by a member of Congress that an official be impeached could be included (perhaps in a separate section) for completeness. I'm sure there have been many such requests throughout history. Thoughts? NoSeptember 13:10, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

Rewrite

As it stands now, the article is pretty much in shambles. It is written in informal tone and contains false and unsourced information. Tagging the article with a rewrite template. BS24 (talk) 16:12, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

I agree. In it's current state, it's almost worthy of presenting for discussion of deletion. —grolltech^(talk) 15:10, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

It might be nice if you helped make it better.Arglebargle79 (talk) 00:13, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

I'm just noting that this was recently found in a newspaper clipping about FDR and the American Bar Assoc. proposing impeaching him- https://www.newspapers.com/clip/43355781/american_bar_assoc_looked_at_proposals/ Obviously more research would be needed on this, but it appears at one point there was talk about this in the US. Aemartinofscb (talk) 12:35, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Impeachment investigations of United States federal officials. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131002172755/http://www.elections.harpweek.com/09Cartoon/BrowseByDateCartoon.asp?Month=June&Date=3 to http://www.elections.harpweek.com/09Cartoon/BrowseByDateCartoon.asp?Month=June&Date=3
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131113201415/http://gretawire.foxnewsinsider.com/2013/11/13/republican-congressman-from-texas-seeks-to-impeach-attorney-general-eric-holder/ to http://gretawire.foxnewsinsider.com/2013/11/13/republican-congressman-from-texas-seeks-to-impeach-attorney-general-eric-holder/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140117034916/http://olson.house.gov/latest-news/olson-introduces-articles-of-impeachment-against-eric-holder1/ to http://olson.house.gov/latest-news/olson-introduces-articles-of-impeachment-against-eric-holder1/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:33, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Scope of article

Shouldn't the article be limited in scope to only focus on those for who had an impeachment investigation. Otherwise, not only is the title a misnomer, but it simply duplicates the scope of other existing articles.

Additionally, shouldn't it be limited to focusing primarily on only the investigations, and not dwell much on subsequent/resultant impeachments.

SecretName101 (talk) 06:52, 1 June 2021 (UTC)