Talk:Imperial circle
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Imperial circle article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
 | On 21 July 2020, it was proposed that this article be moved from Imperial Circle to Imperial circle. The result of the discussion was moved. |
A question about Maastricht
editMaastricht was under a joined sovereignty (condominium) of Liège (Westfalia circle) and Brabant (Burgundy circle). In which circle was Maastricht ?
Category:Holy Roman Empire vs. Category:States of the Holy Roman Empire vs. Category:Circles of the Holy Roman Empire
editCategory:Circles of the Holy Roman Empire is a category within Category:States of the Holy Roman Empire which is in turn a category within Category:Holy Roman Empire. — Robert Greer (talk) 00:54, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
Directors
editI find occasionally references to directors of the Imperial Circles. For example, Brendan Simms's The Struggle for Mastery in Germany calls the King of Prussia (presumably as Duke of Cleves and Mark) and the Elector of Cologne (presumably as Bishop of Münster) the directors of the Westphalian Circle in 1789. The German Wikipedia sometimes mentions the directors of the other circles in their articles - it says the duke of Bavaria and the archbishop of Salzburg directed the Bavarian circle; the duke of Württemberg in Swabia; the Bishop of Worms and Elector Palatine in the Upper Rhenish Circle; the King of Denmark (presumably as Duke of Holstein) and then later the Elector of Brandenburg (as Duke of Magdeburg) and King of Sweden (as Duke of Bremen) in the Lower Saxon Circle; and the Prince-Bishop of Bamberg in the Franconian circle. It'd be nice to find sources and be able to say definitively, though. john k (talk) 17:34, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
This article
editThere is nothing wrong with the content of this article. I would have to say it is a good article. Moreover, it does not need a lot of external references. That is because everything of value is blue-linked. The bottom formatting might need a little polishing. One or two references is enough to cover everything there. It could be expanded, no doubt. So could anything. To a large degree the blue links take care of that. I would expect that the tag could come off with some minor formatting and just a couple of references. The picture by the way is outstanding.Dave (talk) 17:01, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Imperial Circle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120127140233/http://historicalmaps.webs.com/Historical_Maps_of_Germany.htm to http://historicalmaps.webs.com/Historical_Maps_of_Germany.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:15, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
Requested move 21 July 2020
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. —usernamekiran (talk) 19:36, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
Imperial Circle → Imperial circle – The title of this article is not a proper name, there having always been multiple circles, so the word circle should not be capitalized. Indeed, it does not appear to be normally capitalized in academic publications. Surtsicna (talk) 14:31, 21 July 2020 (UTC)—Relisting. © Tbhotch™ (en-3). 04:56, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support as nothing in the article suggests that the title is the proper name of anything. Dicklyon (talk) 01:12, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
- Support - Title is descriptive. Primergrey (talk) 08:47, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
- The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.