Talk:British Columbia v Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd

Canada: British Columbia / Law Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject British Columbia.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian law.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merger

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Agreed with the merger, though I believe the article should be called Imperial Tobacco Canada Limited v. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of British Columbia (or the simpler version thereof) as that is the title of the original case. It is cited by the Supreme Court as British Columbia v. Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd because BC appealed the case and is listed as the appelant but the case began as, and essentially is, Imperial vs. BC as opposed to the opposite - Jord 15:15, 29 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

Correct me if I'm wrong, but the original action was BC suing Imperial Tobacco. LexisNexis as well as my textbooks all cite the case as BC v. Imperial Tobacco. Imperial Tobacco is infact the appellant. I think the title of this article ought to be changed.

Add topic