Talk:Indian locomotive class WG
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Preserved locomotives
edithttp://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Indian_locomotive_class_WG&diff=493658090&oldid=493652575
Please do not remove references when adding information.
The number of preserved locomotives is of note, but needs a source. Thank you.Oranjblud (talk) 14:16, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
List
editMoved from article:
Year | Manufacturer | Serial nos. | Qty | All-India Nos. | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1950–51 | North British Loco | 26415–26514 | 100 | 8301–8400 | |
1950–54 | Chittaranjan | — | 100 | 8401–8500 | |
1955–56 | Société Anglo-Franco-Belge | 2687–2768 | 82 | 8501–8582 | 8517–8580 subcontracted to Henschel (29217–29280) |
1954–55 | Chittaranjan | — | 107 | 8583–8689 | |
1955 | Chittaranjan | — | 50 | 8690–8739 | |
1955–56 | Chittaranjan | — | 100 | 8740–8839 | |
1954 | Henschel & Sohn | 28984–29043 | 60 | 8840–8899 | |
1954 | Krupp | 3391–3430 | 40 | 8900–8939 | |
1954 | Lokomotivfabrik Floridsdorf | 17704–17763 | 60 | 8940–8999 | |
1955 | Baldwin | 76039–76088 | 50 | 9100–9149 | |
1955 | Hitachi | 12261–12285 | 25 | 9150–9174 | |
1955 | North British Loco | 27594–27618 | 25 | 9175–9199 | |
1956 | Ansaldo | 1398–1422 | 25 | 9200–9224 | |
1954 | Hitachi | 12173–12247 | 75 | 9225–9299 | |
1956–57 | Chittaranjan | — | 220 | 9300–9519 | |
1957–59 | Chittaranjan | — | 220 | 9520–9739 | |
1959 | Chittaranjan | — | 118 | 8000–8117 | |
1959–60 | Chittaranjan | — | 172 | 8118–8289 | |
1960–61 | Chittaranjan | — | 120 | 9740–9859 | |
1961 | Chittaranjan | — | 90 | 9860–9949 | |
1962 | Chittaranjan | — | 107 | 9950–10056 | |
1962–63 | Chittaranjan | — | 93 | 10057–10149 | |
1963 | Chittaranjan | — | 51 | 10150–10200 | |
1963–64 | Chittaranjan | — | 92 | 10201–10292 | |
1964–65 | Chittaranjan | — | 75 | 10293–10367 | |
1965 | Chittaranjan | — | 50 | 10368–10417 | |
1967 | Chittaranjan | — | 65 | 10418–10482 | |
1968–70 | Chittaranjan | — | 78 | 10483–10560 |
If there is going to be a list it should be verified. It's also not entirely clear if this is the correct way to present this, or if this isn't overblown coverage. If the table contained additional information on the locos eg differences, service, allocations then I would be more convinced. As is it would be better just to link to a source - there is a limit on what is and is not suitable for an encyclopedia, and what is further reading. Oranjblud (talk) 13:37, 20 October 2012 (UTC)