Talk:Inside Job
(Redirected from Talk:Inside job (disambiguation))
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Aervanath in topic Requested move
This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
Requested move
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved to Inside Job (capital "J"). Aervanath (talk) 21:43, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
Inside job (disambiguation) → Inside job – Inside job is a just a dictionary meaning and not an encyclopedia article. Therefore Inside job should be the disambiguation page . Pengyanan (talk) 03:37, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
- Move to Inside Job. Everything else on the dab page is capitalized, so the page's title should also be capitalized. Inside job can then remain where it is, unless nominated for deletion. Station1 (talk) 06:39, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
- Support Station1's suggestion. I'll likely nominate inside jobs for deletion after this discussion. Powers T 21:49, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
- Comment. I have moved Inside job to Inside jobs. My proposal is to move Inside job (disambiguation) to Inside job or Inside Job and then redirect Inside jobs to the new disambiguation page. I hope that Inside jobs (formerly Inside job) can be maintained as a redirect page so that its edit history can be maintained. We do not need to delete it, please. --Pengyanan (talk) 00:47, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
- Is the edit history important? I suppose a redirect is fine, but it'd be nice to have the weight of an AfD discussion behind it. Powers T 02:55, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
- Move to "Inside Job," per Station1. Kauffner (talk) 03:20, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
- Support mv to Inside Job, per Station1 – In addition to only being a dic def, the title of the crime article is only a vernacular term, not suiting the specificity desired for encyclopedia articles. ENeville (talk) 17:34, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.